%20-%20WHITE.png)
Equitable ownership refers to the situation in which an individual enjoys the benefits and responsibilities of owning a property, even if they don’t hold the legal title. This concept is rooted in equity law, which seeks fairness and justice. Equitable ownership is often compared to legal ownership, where an individual or entity holds the formal legal title.
In essence, an equitable owner holds a beneficial interest in the property. This means they enjoy certain ownership advantages, such as the right to use the property and receive income from it, while taking on responsibilities like property maintenance and taxes. However, they do not possess the formal legal title, which typically belongs to another party.
Who Qualifies as an Equitable Owner?
Several factors must be considered to determine whether someone qualifies as an equitable owner. The Tax Court has outlined specific criteria to assess whether a taxpayer holds the benefits and burdens of ownership, including:
Right to Possess and Use the Property: The individual must have the right to occupy the property and benefit from its use, rent, or profits.
Duty to Maintain the Property: The individual must be responsible for the property's maintenance, including repairs and upkeep.
Responsibility for Insuring the Property: The individual must insure the property against risks like damage or loss.
Bearing the Property’s Risk of Loss: The individual must assume the risk of loss associated with the property, such as damage or depreciation.
Obligation to Pay Property Taxes and Assessments: The individual must be responsible for paying property taxes, assessments, or related charges.
Right to Improve the Property: The individual must have the right to improve the property without the owner's consent.
Right to Obtain Legal Title: The individual must have the right to obtain legal title by paying the remaining balance of the purchase price.
These criteria establish whether an individual has enough control and responsibility over the property to be considered an equitable owner.
Tax Implications of Equitable Ownership
Equitable ownership has significant tax implications, especially concerning mortgage interest and property tax deductions. Individuals who establish equitable ownership may qualify for tax deductions that would otherwise be unavailable. The IRS allows taxpayers to deduct mortgage interest and property taxes if they are considered equitable owners of the property, based on tax court rulings.
Mortgage Interest Deduction: According to IRS rules, a taxpayer may deduct home mortgage interest if they paid interest on a mortgage for real estate in which they are the legal or equitable owner. This means that even if someone is not directly liable for the mortgage, they can still deduct the interest if they meet the equitable ownership criteria.
Property Tax Deduction: Similarly, equitable owners can deduct property taxes they pay on the property. The critical factor is whether the individual is responsible for paying the property taxes.
Examples of Equitable Ownership
Binding Purchase Contract and Occupancy Agreement: In the Tax Court case of Uslu, Saffet (TC Memo 1997-551), the taxpayer entered into a binding contract to purchase a residence and took possession under an “occupancy agreement” while awaiting financing. The agreement made the taxpayer responsible for utility payments, insurance, and, after two months, repairs to systems like plumbing and heating. The court determined these responsibilities transferred enough burdens and benefits of ownership to the taxpayer, making them an equitable owner and eligible for a mortgage interest deduction.
Living on the Property and Covering Expenses: In Njenge, Ndile G. (TC Summary Opinion 2008-84), the taxpayer’s son was the legal owner of the property, but he did not live there. The taxpayer lived in the property, covered all expenses, and later rented it out, acting as the landlord. The court concluded that the taxpayer held the burdens and benefits of ownership, making them an equitable owner and eligible to deduct property taxes.
Contributing to Down Payment and Mortgage Payments: In Edosada, Conrad (TC Summary Opinion 2012-17), the title and mortgage were not in the taxpayer’s name, but they contributed to the down payment and made mortgage payments. The court ruled that these actions made the taxpayer an equitable owner.
Examples Where Taxpayers Were Not Equitable Owners
No Beneficial Interest in the Property: In Daya, Gabriel (TC Memo 2000-360), the taxpayers’ sons lived with their parents in a residence owned jointly by their father and uncle. The sons did not contribute financially or have any agreement granting them an ownership interest. The court determined that the sons did not hold a beneficial interest in the property and were not equitable owners.
No Right to Possession or Use of the Property: In Puentes, Lourdes (TC Memo 2013-277), the taxpayer made mortgage payments to help her brother, the legal owner of a home, but had no right to possess, use, or maintain the property. The court ruled she was not an equitable owner.
Maximizing Tax Benefits Through Equitable Ownership
Equitable ownership is a vital concept in property law and tax planning, enabling individuals to claim mortgage interest and property tax deductions even if they do not hold the legal title. By meeting the required criteria, such as having the right to possess and use the property, maintaining it, and bearing its risks, taxpayers can establish equitable ownership and maximize their tax benefits.
Whether you’re entering a binding purchase contract, covering property expenses, or contributing to mortgage payments, equitable ownership can provide substantial tax advantages.
Contact our office if you have any questions related to equitable ownership.